Monday, April 15, 2013


ARE NEW OFFICES NECESSARY?

Everyone says that when business is good, you’re supposed to be able to relax a little. Whoever said that never set foot in the office of your magazine.

When you launched the magazine, the staff consisted of you (editor and publisher), an advertising salesperson (who also handled distribution), an art director, a page designer, and a production director. All writing was by freelancers. As circulation has grown, so have the number of pages in the magazine and the frequency with which you publish issues. That core of six people has quadrupled, causing the space you all occupy to become cramped. At 6,000 square feet, the office is comfortably full with 25 people. Your problem is that you have more work than your 25 employees can comfortably handle, and you need to hire about five more people. Where will you put them?

The way you see it, you have a couple of options. First, you could move. Pack everyone’s desk up, all the equipment, and find a space that will accommodate a larger and growing workforce. Moving, though, would be costly. Companies typically charge upwards of $50 per hour per mover, plus you’d have to get insurance to cover the move. The Better Business Bureau received complaints about companies in over 1,000 industries; the moving industry received over 5,000 complaints, putting them 11th on that list. Finding a reputable, high-quality moving company could take time away from magazine work. And managing the logistics could be a nightmare. You can’t just shut down, turn off the phones, and move in peace. You’d still have to conduct business, sell ads, edit copy, handle subscriptions, lay out pages, shoot photos, and do dozens of other day-to-day activities. Plus, the sheer volume of paper archives related to five years of magazine publishing, not to mention all the technology hardware, would make packing and unpacking a big endeavor for each of your workers.

The second option: Stay put and let workers telecommute. Although you’d avoid the headache of a move, you’d trade the management of a one-time event (moving offices) for regular management of everyone’s on-site and off-site schedules. Telecommuting is on the verge of being a widely accepted form of scheduling despite the very real danger of work and home life blending into one big pot of time. Already 40 percent of Americans work evenings, weekends, or on rotating shifts, and the numbers of full-time workers who work from home at least one day a month rose 30 percent in a single year, proving the trend is toward working from home. People tend to romanticize working from home, however, and forget that there are real challenges (like not having access to convenient photocopying or shipping, lack of quiet space, not enough space, and, yes, no social interaction).

You’re primarily concerned about a drop in creativity as fewer people are on site to collaborate and give feedback on article ideas, layouts, and other decisions that come up nearly every hour. Statistically, 14 percent of U.S. workers who could telecommute if they wanted still prefer to work in an office. That means you could be left with only four people in the office! But offering telecommuting would let you tap into a larger talent pool and help you retain workers who are looking for flexibility with their schedules and work locations. If your employees could work from home, you wouldn’t lose as much time during inclement weather either—no more snow days.

Even though your choice is between two options—move or offer telecommuting—you also need to consider how involved your employees should be in the decision. Telecommuting affects their work and home lives, but the expense and the responsibility for managing the project will be yours.

Sources: T. Rivas, “Atypical Workdays Becoming Routine,” The Wall Street Journal, 4 April 2006, A19; S. Shellenbarger, “When Working at Home Doesn’t Work: How Companies Comfort Telecommuters,” The Wall Street Journal, 24 August 2006, B1; “Real Estate Exchange,” U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration, available online at http://knowledge.fhwa.dot.gov/cops/rex.nsf/discussionDisplay?Open&id=EF35631CF1E86D918525709200504C4E&Group=Relocation%20Forum&tab=DISCUSSION; M.-Y. Lee, “Don’t Fall into the Trap of Paying Extra Moving Costs,” BuyerZone.com, 15 May 2001, available online at www.buyerzone.com/features/savvy_shopper/ss051501.html.


1. How involved should your employees be in making the decision?

2. Because everyone has worked closely in the same open office, you’ve been able to use an achievement-oriented leadership style. Would a shift to telecommuting require a change in style? Explain.

3. How do you manage space issues as your business grows? 

40 comments:

  1. In my opinion the employees should not be very involved in these decisions, of course, I think it would be good if you ask employees what they would like, but at the end of the day you are the one who will have to decide of is convenient to make a change in the office, or just working at home. You're the one who must do the analysis to know what is convenient for the business and define your short or long term goals.
    I think that telecommuting is a truly radical change, because your employees are used to working together as a team, sharing opinions and coexisting. Telecommuting can be very helpful because it gives you more comfort and and the employees don't have to deal with office problems. But in my opinion I do not like working this way because of it is very difficult coexisting and working in team. I think that for a company grows up, there must be a communication between each of the members, and with this work together to achieve a good in common.
    To find out which is the most convenient for my company, first I must do an analysis of my goals, if they are short or in a long term, if they are in a short term, the most convenient is the telecommuting because it is an easy way to solve the problem but exist the risk that if employees do not develop the same performance and this could affect the company as well.
    In my opinion if I were in charge, and if I want to continue growing up I choose looking for a new office, I have to think long term and there must be at some point a sacrifice, but it's clear for a time the company could be affected , but then we would have more opportunities to boost the company grows up. Also the employees are in a more comfortable environment so I believe that this sacrifice would help the company more and yield more fruits in the future.

    Sources:"Learning effectively through Groupwork" http://www.eng.monash.edu.au/current-students/download/groupwork.pdf

    Andrea Sarahi Garcia Gonzalez 1552311

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I disagree with your opinion about not involving employees in the decision making process. They are the ones that keep your company running and also they are one of the main reason that your company is growing. So I think that, if they are the ones mainly affected by the decision, they should be highly involved in it as if they do not like it performance may decrease and the company's growth may be stopped.

      Francisco Alejandro González Peña. 1568304

      Delete
    2. I disagree with the opinion of Andrea, because employees must be involved in the decision about how they work, because they are the engine of the company, and helps to have a better work performance and a good environment between the workers and that employees feel that they are heard in the company by their bosses.

      Karla Veronica Montelongo Reyes - 1555542

      Delete
    3. This comment has been removed by the author.

      Delete
    4. if you are the owner you must to hear new ideas from your employees because they are working all the year they know more than you the know wahat is it going on in the company im my opinion they have to be part of tkaing decicion!

      armando garcia estrada 1516175

      Delete
    5. I disagree with your opinion that the manager is the only who must decide, I think that the manager is who have the last word but it is so important hear the opinion of your employees

      Cecilia Alejandra Galeana Rodríguez
      ID: 1551658

      Delete
  2. I think that this kind of problem in every company exists, and is more when we are talking about big companies. In this case it is about a magazine company and I don’t think that it is really necessary to change to a bigger place because, it is a magazine the service that this company is giving, so a magazine is more writing and photos than anything else, so I think that is able to manage this kind of companies through telecommuting and web.
    (1)Of course, I think that all the employees should be involved in making the decision because, every magazine has different categories and in every category are specialized people that know about the specific subject. So in these cases when the workers are making their job, they present the new ideas that would change or make better the aspect and the topic in the magazine, and that suggestion would make the magazine win more profit or even be better than others, and the company will increase their gains and would make that their employees feel important and with the capacity to be better.
    (2)I don’t think so because even if you are going to work with the person in that way (telecommuting) you need to know the person and the abilities that these one has in the first interview that will be face-to-face. And then when you have finished all the interviews you will select the indicate person(s) to make the job, and you will tell him/her that way he/she will work (even if it is via internet), because even in that way there are different manners to work and that the person must follow, to achieve the goals of your company.
    (3) I think that if my company grows faster and increases the income, I will have enough money to change to a bigger location in which my employees will have a better performance for them and for the company, and that will be a benefit for everybody.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Actually, we have to take in consideration the financial status of the company because its growing and more space is needed as well as employees. So I disagree in what you mention at the beginning, because the offices are really necessary, but not at this moment. The company should find the perfect time to move to another place.

      Delete
    2. I agree with you Fatima because to me, it is a good idea( to change in another location) obviouly if the company has a good income, but as I wrote if the company does not have good income, I think that I would take the other option, that is to having some employees at home and some employees in the company.
      Samantha Alejandra Salazar Gamez ID: 1562757

      Delete
  3. In some aspect am disagree and agree with Andrea. I disagree because she mentions that the employees should not be involved in the decisions making, and that for me is totally wrong, I think that every single employee is able to say and suggest any new and good idea for the magazine or the content that this one would have, and of course the person that it is in charge of all the content of the magazine would check if the suggestions are good to implement them in the magazine.
    Another think am disagree is because she says that is not good to work in the telecommuting way because the employees must work in team but, I think that not all the works must be in team working, if I would work in that way (telecommuting) probably, I will send my work to the person that checks if it is correct what I have done, and if there are some mistakes he will be the one that would tell me – You know what, please change that or this! – so I think that, that is team working, even if you are not face-to-face someone is supporting you, by telling you what is correct or wrong. But I agree with her in the way that, telecommuting is an easier way to work and also that if you change or not to an another location even if it is small or big there would be times in which you as a company will have gains or losses, and not all the time this happens because the location or the size in where do you work, this happens because the content of the service or product isn’t to good for the customers or they don’t like it.

    Fátima Dragustinovis López. 1545768

    ReplyDelete
  4. The two options presented to the company we are big changes, either for the employees or for the company that should be taken lightly, because if an error occurs, would produce a huge waste of money, resources and time.
    First I argue that the qualified manager and employees decide who is fit to work in the office and who is able to work with telecommute. And so skilled employees and the manager asked them which option they would prefer.
    Secondly I think that employees who work at home or away, will suffer a change in the way they work with others, how to lead others or their own work. But you can get used and continue to use his style of leading video conferencing to stay in touch with their peers.
    And answering the last question I think that because the company will continue to grow, and remote work may not work for all, is better than the office does not completely relocate, you can departmentalize the company, and only move certain departments to a new place.
    In my view, I think to be fair to all employees, as not all will choose telework or work in the office, it would be better that all employees will share how to work a month working in the office and one month from home, so will learn different ways to work together. And then the manager may departmentalize office and certain areas may move to a new place.

    Karla Veronica Montelongo Reyes. - 1555542

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I agree with you, is very drastic change for the employee who always worked from home, put it to work with others in an office, maybe they could not perform in the same way and this would affect the company. I disagree with you on the aspect of change in the way people work, because employees can not perform in the same way if they do so sudden changes in a short time.

      Delete
    2. I totally agree with you Karla in the part of departmentalize the company, but also you have to take in mind which company you are leading because in many parts they need to be communicating by presence, but in this case of the magazine I consider that it could be possible.

      Liliana Garcia Salinas 1549690

      Delete
    3. I agree with Karla, It may be good for employees to share between them their experiences either from office or house, at the end, every employee had the opportunity to choose between home or office, so every month when employees share their opinions I think, you must have only positive feedback, if you don’t, you may have a problem in the system.
      Gerardo de Jesus Riveroll Rivera #1527316

      Delete
    4. I agree with my classmate Karla because top level managers and middle managers should have personnel that have the core competence skills to try out telecommute while having office with employees to find out which employees are ready to choose and be productive in any scenario. This leads to a goal set that will need to be made though brainstorming ideas on how employees want to work while giving them benefits and incentives with motivation to keep in working hard in telecommuting. Which ultimately can lead to success and economic al benefits for both employees and manager of the enterprise.
      Jesus Alejandro Solis Zavala 1648856

      Delete
    5. I'm agree with you in some things but I'm disagree with the idea that the employees work one month in the company and one month in their houses because not all the people have the capacity to work by themselves, I think that this idea can work but only if the employees who work in this way are the employees in which the managers can put their confidence because know that they will accomplish the work.

      Cecilia Alejandra Galeana Rodríguez
      ID: 1551658

      Delete
  5. I think that some employees should be sent telecommuting and other should stay at the offices. I would make my decision based on the employees wanting to go or stay, their skills, the company's financial status, and the trust in each and everyone of the employees.
    1) I think that employees should be involved in making this decision as they are the ones that will be mainly affected by it. Also I must recall that human resources are the soul of the company, so they must be taken into high consideration for the firm's decisions.
    2) I think the style would not require a change, but an addition. The company is not only going to worry about achieving the goals, but also about fostering creativity within its employees by web-courses or by monthly giving them conferences with professionals that help them to do so. It would be a creative achieving leadership style.
    3) I think that, if the business is growing, it would be good to move to a bigger place, but the company must consider doing it to a close site for the costs and obstacles to decrease.

    Francisco Alejandro González Peña. 1568304

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I agree with Alejandro because it is true that the soul and the engine of the company are human resources, and if employees do not feel comfortable with the way of work they will not work well, or will fall into the monotony and that in a magazine can be fatal.
      I also liked the idea of ​​looking for a place nearby to move the company, and thus reduce costs.

      Delete
    2. I agree with Alex because the employees must have the decision, at the end of the day, they are who make the work and the company has to find the best environment for them. And if the business is growing, the best would be to move to a bigger place.
      I disagree with you when you say that the style does not require a change because if the company is changing the way of working, consequently the style have to change.

      Jaqueline Guadalupe Mansur Valdez ID:1557772

      Delete
    3. I don’t agree with your opinion, it’s a good idea to ask your employees what they want to do, and doing it by the Human Resources Department may be the right way to do it, because HRD is in charge of the employees, but, I don’t think that moving may be a great idea, because you will need to change the direction on services providers, suppliers, and customers, I know it may be done by e-mail but you will also need to have a different phone number while get the old one, and in that process sales may be affected more than you may think, I think that the solution is to hire people or move employees that would like to telecommute, and being this a magazine I don’t find it very difficult to be done.
      Gerardo de Jesus Riveroll Rivera #1527316

      Delete
  6. I agree with Karla when she says employees should be given a month to try telecommuting, because that would give them a better idea of what it is and if either they want it or not. It would also be good to the employees because they would live a whole new experience by interacting with their partners online and they would learn how to use new computer softwares also, which would make them more skilled workers. Despite being miles away, telecommuting seems the best option for the company to avoid future problems.

    Francisco Alejandro González Peña. 1568304

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I am agree with both Francisco and Karla. I think that the employees should choose the best option that will fit for them, in this case if they are capable to stay in their homes and make a good job or to be in the office dealing with many people and work.
      I also agree in the idea they have of not moving all the company to a new location as they say, the company can move different departments or offices in a different location and then divide them in departments so that can be easy in a certain point, but the bad think here would be that if the company grows more, the company would have more expenses in the translation of material or things that are not in an specific area; because if an employee needs something of another area that is not in the same location in where is him, it will cost the translation to go to one place to the other one, so I think that it will be the same, the company will be losing money in thinks that could have in a same building, So why not buy since the beginning a bigger place in which all the areas can be together?

      Delete
  7. Well this is a complicated case because both of them have advantages and disadvantages. First, if the company moves out, it is the easier option, but it generates more expenses and spends more time to make it. If the company offers telecommuting, I can save money and time. But it is more difficult to separate the work from the responsibilities of home, and maybe the employees are distracted by using chat.
    1.I think that the employees should be involved in making the decision because at the end of the day, they are who really make the company works. If we ask them what they want or what they prefer, it will be a motivation for them. So they are going to feel more comfortable working there, and it could avoid any kind of problems. But in the other side, we as managers have to see for the best of the company.
    2.Maybe it can require a change because employees that do not have experience in that way of working will need special courses or something like that. But to me the telecommuting is an excellence way to work. For example the employees now can avoid the traffic and they will be more relaxed. Also they don’t have the same pressure that working in the office. In the other hand, the employees can be bored of the routine because they don’t interact with their coworkers, but it is the same quality of work.
    3.If my company is growing up, I need a bigger place to work, to create a better environment for the workers and to be more recognized. My employees will feel more comfortable working there, where each one has more space to work.

    Jaqueline Guadalupe Mansur Valdez ID:1557772

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Well, a solution for what you mention that "They can get bored, and find it routinary", I think thats why meetings should be presented like for twice a week, so they aren't always having an indirect communication.
      And I agree in what you mention before, that some employees don't have the experience in telecommunication, so obviously there has to be training.

      Armando Cazares Lopez - 1546857

      Delete
    2. I agree with you, because you can involved the employees in decision making but at the end of the day you as a manager have to decide the best option for the company.
      And I agree with you too, in the aspect of telecommuting, because as employee it's very dificult concentrate at home, and that would affect the company.

      Delete
    3. I agree with you Jaqueline, but I don't really think that a business needs to have a bigger place to work to be more recognized, they will be by the quality of their job and by the preference of the people by that company, not by the space where they work. But in the other aspects that you mention I totally agree with your point of view.

      Liliana Garcia Salinas 1549690

      Delete
    4. This comment has been removed by the author.

      Delete
    5. i think if you want that you company be recognized chose the qualify people for the job you dont need a big company to be the best... make your employees happy then they will do the best!

      armando garcia estrada 1516175

      Delete
  8. Communication is very important among the personnel, especially if it’s a magazine. Since the company is growing, there isn’t enough space for them to work. I think that is up to the employee’s decision whether they feel more comfortable working at home or at the offices. Thus, the employees are highly and totally involved in the decision, because they are the ones who do the work and make the company flow. My advice is that the company should use the telecommunication for a while and to look for another bigger place for the company, so later on they can choose the right spot at the appropriate time, not affecting the company’s activities.
    The new offices are really necessary because of the company’s growing. Like any other successful business who starts from the bottom and rises to top, consequently, they have to hired more employees, open new establishments in order to fulfill the customers’ expectations. What it says at the beginning of the article caught my attention, “Everyone says that when business is good, you’re supposed to be able to relax a little. Whoever said that never set foot in the office of your magazine.” This actually tells us that some think that if it’s a great place to work, it isn't that stressful at all, but they are wrong. When a business is good they have to work a lot for it, and imagine a place where is very crowded is going to be more stressful & employees might get confused, appearing problems.

    Armando Cazares Lopez - 1546857

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. This comment has been removed by the author.

      Delete
    2. I agree with armando, because if a company has too much work in hand it means that the company is growing which leads to more benefits and idea gathering. Next telecommunications would make company's work a little easier because it will save money and time on both members of the company. The decision will need to be made upon workers and top level managers.Everyone says that when business is good, you’re supposed to be able to relax a little. Whoever said that never set foot in the office of your magazine. This is important to follow protocol to increase and expand nationally. It follows and shows how much of a good company and integrity it has.
      Jesus Alejandro Solis Zavala 1648856

      Delete
  9. I agree with you because the employees must have the final decision about where they feel more comfortable to work and if they feel happy, they are going to have a better performance to work.
    And you are right, the new offices are necessary because in a small place to work the employees get stressed.

    Jaqueline Guadalupe Mansur Valdez ID:1557772

    ReplyDelete
  10. 1. - I think that they have to be involve in the decision making because they are part of the job and they make it possible, so the owner have to take in mind their opinions, but that doesn’t mean that he have to do all what they want, but it is important to know what they think because maybe they could get him better ideas. That is why the department of human resources is very important because they take part in all this questions and help the business.
    2. - I don’t really think so. If they are conscious of what they are doing and they do what they really want, the quality of their work is going to be the same. Working by telecommunication doesn’t mean that the quality of their work is going to decrease, but maybe at first the company would feel the difference but I think that they will get adapted very soon.
    3. - If my business starts growing very quickly a good option it will be having another plant with different areas of job, but obviously that depends in the kind of business that consists the company. Other option could be moving by parts, so they cannot be distracted by all the movement in one building to another. But If I want to start a company I have to consider at first the scope that I want so I will not have this kind of problems in a future and the employees are not going to feel uncomfortable with all the movements done there.

    Liliana Garcia Salinas 1549690

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I agree with you Lily because if you hear their opinions you can take a better decision but as I publish it does not mean that I agree about everything that they told me,only help you to take the best decision

      Delete
  11. Well in this case you have two options, to move or to telecommute, obviously you need to know what your employees want, because they are your workforce and keeping them happy is essential for your productivity, if not it may be affected. I think that you need more than a survey or a questioner; in my opinion you will need a bigger analysis. For example to determine if you telecommute or move to bigger offices, first of all, the new building is company’s property? Or you will need to pay rent, if so how much money is the difference? If you measure the five new employee’s productivity as money will it be more or less than the extra that you will pay in rent? Let’s imagine for a minute that the productivity of your five new employees exceeds what you will pay in rent, will the company be able to move in a certain period of time without reducing or affecting the production of magazines? Because if they don’t, the will be force to pay rent in both buildings, the new one and the old ones, and that is not good for the company. Now, imagine new production of employees doesn’t exceed what you will pay of rent in a bigger building; this is the time when you ask your employees if they want to work in the office or in the house, it is very probable that some of them will accept to work from home, leaving room for five new employees. This is the way it should be done, because if you send new employees to telecommute, they may never get involved with the company, and also they may have some doubts that may be better attended in person than done by phone. In the case that no employee wants to go home to telecommute; you should order them to do so. If they still don’t want too, you will always find people similar capabilities than your last employee and/or willing to accept a job no matter what.
    Gerardo de Jesus Riveroll Rivera #1527316

    ReplyDelete
  12. 1)In my opinion the employees of any company or business should be aware of what is happening within the company, as they are an essential part in business so if I were in that situation, I probably involve my employees, I hear their opinions or ideas but that does not mean that I agree about everything that they told me, it just to make a better decision with different perspectives and ideologies.
    2)I do not think that if in a company implemented a telecommunicating must change style of the business, I do not think that implementing telecommunication is a reason to change the style of a business primarily because for me it is waste of time, money and effort. For me it is better to attach the telecommunication within the style that has been in business, because if they did well they can do better, I said that because, as to be able to implement something new we can improve the system that was being in business. it is difficult but you always can achieve whatever goal you have. And if you have a good team work you can solve any problem easier than if you are alone.
    3) I think that this should not be an obstacle for business; I do not think that is something that is to worry much, because if the business is going well, I can expand the place where the business is located or find another place to set it. But if the company does not have good income, I think that I would take the option of having some employees with a high potential working at home and some in the office.
    Samantha Alejandra Salazar Gamez ID: 1562757

    ReplyDelete
  13. In this case we are talking about a magazine company , i think is not necessary to move a bigger place to work because the new employees can work without company making models, in my opinión the people that have to be in the office are the most important people of the company for example the boss, the managers, the people who are choosing the topyc of the magazin those kind of people.

    Employees that are working without of the company , they will work harder because they want to be part of the office then they will give to the manager new ideas to make the magazine better.
    But sometimes is not a good idea have people working by video conferencing because maybe they are not working as it should be.

    the best option is giving to the employees a quiz to know who are capacity people to work without of the company , the employees thar were choosen have to do exellent work and sometime they should go to the company to show the new Project or ideas.

    if the employees do a good job as we should prize to give them an office so that they can work with all the resources and continue to make the work faster and growing up faster.
    Armando garcia estrada 1516175

    ReplyDelete
  14. In my opinion working from work can be easier than travelling to an office because as an employee drive from home to a company can be expensive, but if the company is struggling and makes a change were employees can alternate working from work once a week money can be save for both members of the party.now if the enterprise wants to implement a new goal to save money it would have to consider new strategies to help out their employees both economically and have incentives to motivate them to keep on working hard both in or out of the company. It is a good decision to have a telecommute to gather and help out single mothers who sometimes do not have the resources to leave their kids with a babysitter or at after school curriculum. Finally that is the way an enterprise can save and help their employees to save money on transportation while gaining awesome incentives and promotions
    Jesus Alejandro Solis Zavala 1648856

    ReplyDelete
  15. This case is a little difficult because in the bot ways to work, the company is going to have advantages and disadvantages.
    If the company decide change its location, it’s going to be so stressful for the managers and to the whole personnel readjust to a new place and also the company could lose a lot of money; in the other hand, if the company decide to work by telecommuting could have employees who doesn’t like to work in that way or maybe they are the type of workers who need the manager pressure them to do a good work because if no one is pressure them they don’t accomplish the work.

    1) I think that the employees must be involved in the decision of still working in a place or working by telecommuting because they are the ones who going to work in that way but, the decision must be do by the manager.

    Another option could be that only some employees work by telecommuting, thos employees must be people responsible and committed with their work, people who the manager can give the confidence to work alone but anyway accomplish the work, this people could go to the company 1 or 2 time a week and that way the can feel part of the company, also the company could make video chats to see how the work of the employee is going.

    2) I think that you can’t use the same style of working if you are working in an office or in telecommuting because, in the office you have the employees close to you, you can see how there are and can realize which are their needs, and working by telecommuting you can’t see all this things so, you need to make changes in your style work, that with the porpoise that the workers keep having the confidence in the company and make sure that the company is worried about their workers.
    3) I think that in the future I have problems because my company is growing up,l the best thing I can do is lokk for a bigger place but this place must be near of may actual company’s localitatio, this for avoid the time that will take to move the entire company to another place and keeping the low costs.

    Cecilia Alejandra Galeana Rofriguez ID: 1551658

    ReplyDelete
  16. The employees are who make the company work besides the customers but in this case we are talking about the establishment, where does all the company's activities are realize by the empolyees and is really important they comfort for an efficient and effective performance, off course they need to be involve in the decisions they will be taken but to have a better order we can have a leader in each different departments that the company could have like logistic, marketing, accounting, besides others. In this way if the CEO want to make changes the manager of each department can talk for all their partners.
    In my opinion telecommute is a tiptop solution and more for the ladies that are pregnant or have family, and they want to work but also to be more time in home, for those that don't like the idea to work from home they can continue on the office. We need to find a solution if we hire more empolyees and my solution is to alternate employees 2 days of the week they need to work from home and the other 4 or 3 on the office, in this way the employees would have their schedule of which days there are working from home and which day they are going to the office, and I think that telecommute is a great idea to consider employees from other countries and they can work from their home.
    Finally if the company start to grow and the number of employees increases the best option is to buy another establishment off course if the profit is fluid.

    Diana Edith Arizpe Leal 1544480

    ReplyDelete